Legal Opinion

Borel v. Rollins

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1866PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Currey, C. J.:

This is an action of ejectment for a lot of land situated at the corner of Mission and Ninth streets, in the City of San Francisco, in the block lying between Mission and Howrard streets and Ninth and Tenth streets, which was known in former years as Lot Number Three, of the Mission Addition. The action was commenced on the 28th of July, 1864. The defendants’ answer was a traverse of all the material allegations of the complaint, in addition to which it is averred that the defendant Rollins was at the time of answering the owner in fee simple of the demanded…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. RightmyreNew York Supreme Court · 1819

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Frost v. Erath Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Johnston v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Sparks v. MaukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Delano v. JacobyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API