Legal Opinion

Baldwin-Heckes Co. v. Kammerlohr

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1932No. 28210PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This is an action at law by the holder and purchaser of a negotiable promissory note against the maker thereof and the payee named therein who indorsed the same. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the indorser only appeals.

The sole question presented for determination in this review is whether the words, “October 27, 1930, I hereby assign the within note and mortgage to Baldwin-Heckes Company. (Signed) J. W. Curl,” constitutes a qualified indorsement, or do they impose on Curl the liability of a general indorser. The evidence of the appellant, uncontradicted, is that, when delivered by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Markey v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Citizens National Bank v. WaltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  3. Maddox v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Leahy v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Maine Trust & Banking Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Securities Acceptance Corp. v. BlakeNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ouachita Industries v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API