Baldwin-Heckes Co. v. Kammerlohr
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.
This is an action at law by the holder and purchaser of a negotiable promissory note against the maker thereof and the payee named therein who indorsed the same. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the indorser only appeals.
The sole question presented for determination in this review is whether the words, “October 27, 1930, I hereby assign the within note and mortgage to Baldwin-Heckes Company. (Signed) J. W. Curl,” constitutes a qualified indorsement, or do they impose on Curl the liability of a general indorser. The evidence of the appellant, uncontradicted, is that, when delivered by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Markey v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Citizens National Bank v. WaltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Maddox v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Leahy v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Maine Trust & Banking Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Securities Acceptance Corp. v. BlakeNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Ouachita Industries v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963