Legal Opinion
Village of Wappingers Falls v. Maul
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 16, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the State of New York Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities dated December 20, 2001, which, after a hearing, rejected the petitioner’s objections to the establishment of a community residential facility for the disabled in the Village of Wappingers Falls.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the determination of the Commissioner of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jennings v. New York State Office of Mental HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Town of Oyster Bay v. MaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Cedar Grove Civic Homeowners Ass'n v. MaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Town of Kent v. MaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Town of Southeast v. MaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Village of Port Chester v. AyotteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matter of Village of Port Chester, N.Y. v. DelaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017