Legal Opinion

Town of Kent v. Maul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the State of New York Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, dated December 31, 1997, which, after a hearing, overruled the petitioner’s objections to the establishment of a community residential facility at Lot #28, Deer Hill Road, in the Town of Kent, New York.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

While the notice sent by the respondents to the petitioner Town of Kent pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jennings v. New York State Office of Mental HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Town of Brunswick v. WebbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Town of DeWitt v. SurlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Town of Oyster Bay v. MaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Cedar Grove Civic Homeowners Ass'n v. MaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Village of Wappingers Falls v. MaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API