In Re Estate of Ragen
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson
Petitioner, Robert E. Ragen, brought an action for the admission into probate of a will codicil allegedly executed by the decedent, James M. Ragen. The trial court denied admission of the purported codicil to probate, finding that the decedent’s signature had been forged. On appeal, petitioner contends that the trial court erred (1) in allowing the testimony of handwriting experts to prevail over the uncontested testimony of the attesting witnesses; (2) in admitting the testimony of the estate’s attorney over petitioner’s claim of an attorney-client privilege; and (3) in admitting Virginia…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Krupp v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re Estate of RagenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Shepherd v. YokumIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- Conway v. ConwayIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Monier v. ChamberlainAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rybak v. ProvenzaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Berry v. American Standard, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Flack v. McClureAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- McGee v. NicolaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- In re: the Estate of KoesterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.