Legal Opinion

Howland, Hess, Guinan & Torpey v. Perzel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

Susan Perzel appeals from the trial court’s order denying her petition to reinstate the appeal from a judgment of the District Justice. We affirm.

The facts and procedural history giving rise to this appeal are as follows: Appellee, the law firm of Howland, Hess, Guinan & Torpey (Howland), filed a complaint with the District Justice, James B. Hunter, against Appellant, Susan Perzel (Perzel), to recover unpaid legal fees. After a hearing the District Justice entered a judgment on August 23, 1994 in favor of Howland for $2,899.65 plus costs. Perzel filed a timely notice of appeal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Anderson v. Centennial Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Quarato v. Facelifters, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Slaughter v. Allied HeatingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Voland v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John D. Hughes Construction Inc. v. Funk, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County2009
  2. New Castle Sch. of Trades v. Kapchus, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API