Legal Opinion
Maloney v. Rhodes
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1976No. 75-1049PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neiul, C. J.
The first question presented for determination may be stated thus: Is the Secretary of State constitutionally obligated to file a law passed by both Houses of the General Assembly and signed by the Speaker of the House and the Governor of the state when it is properly delivered to him for filing?
The answer to that question is, “yes.”
The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas reads, in part, as follows:
“2. The court further finds * * * that Amended House Bills Nos. 18 and 44; Substitute House Bill No. 43, and the Amended Senate Bills Nos. 3, 4 and 5 are incomplete legislation and ineligible for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Wallace v. City of CelinaOhio Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by22 opinions
- State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Citizens in Charge, Inc. v. Jon HustedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- State ex rel. Hodges v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Ohio General Assembly v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Governor v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.