Legal Opinion
Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 8, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0973PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, challenges the decision of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) to deny his application for retirement benefits allegedly owed him from his employment with Shearson Hamill and Co., Inc., which merged with Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., in 1974. Contending that plaintiff was previously paid his benefits, PBGC moves to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [Dkt. # 7]. Plaintiff has filed two responses to the motion [Dkt. ## 9, 11] and PBGC has filed a reply [Dkt. # 10]. For the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Deville v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Senick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016