Legal Opinion

Goldbard v. Kirchik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, loss of services and medical expenses, by tenants in a multiple dwelling against its two owners (Julius J. Barchik and David Kirchik), the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 4, 1962 (as amd. Sept. 4, 1962) after a jury trial, upon a verdict in favor of both defendants. Judgment (as amd.) reversed on the law and the facts insofar as it is in favor of the defendant Julius J. Kirchik, and new trial granted as to said defendant, with costs to abide the event, and without prejudice to such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wanamaker v. SpringsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Kaminsky v. American Newspapers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wisdom v. WisdomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Testa v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Gerichten v. RuizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Condy v. AlprenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API