Legal Opinion
Mund v. Rambough
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1988No. Civ. 880072Published
1Opinion of the Court
432 N.W.2d 50 (1988)
Ervin MUND, Jerome Voegele and Dr. Louis Tepoel, Plaintiffs and Appellees,
v.
Helen A. RAMBOUGH, Defendant and Appellant, and
The State of North Dakota and all persons unknown claiming any estate or interest in, or lien or encumbrance upon the property described in the Complaint, Defendants.
Civ. No. 880072.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
November 10, 1988.
Vogel Law Firm, Mandan, for defendant and appellant; argued by Colette N. Bruggman.
Lucas & Smith, Bismarck, for plaintiffs and appellees; argued by Sheldon A. Smith.
Thomas B. Tudor, Bank of North Dakota, Bismarck, for…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Arneson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Johnson v. HassettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Kitto v. Minot Park DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.