Gresham v. Lee
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge George L. Bell. October 27, 1920.
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. The first grant of a new trial, whether on motion made in the court in which the trial was had or on certiorari, will always be affirmed unless the verdict and judgment rendered were as a matter of law demanded. This is true even though the new trial was granted upon some ground other than the discretionary grounds, and even though the judge in granting the new trial had no jurisdiction to pass upon the discretionary grounds, and even though the court may have committed error in passing upon the specific ground upon which it awarded a new trial. See in this connection, Weinkle v. Brunswick…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weinkle & Sons v. Brunswick & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Cox v. GradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Gresham v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
3Cited by10 opinions
- Freedman v. BushCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Smith v. Williamson & Sons Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Connally Realty Co. v. NalleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Zeigler v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Driskell v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.