Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Rose

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1997No. 96-125PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

This appeal must be dismissed because of the failure of Jesse Junior Sherman and Doris Maye Sherman (Shermans) to file a notice of appeal within thirty days from the entry of the Order Granting Summary Judgment. In response to a contention by P.J. Rose (Rose) that this Court lacks jurisdiction, the Sher-mans rely upon a motion to reconsider order granting plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, filed in the district court, as tolling the time within which the notice of appeal was required to be filed. We hold that a motion to reconsider a decision must be the functional…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Atkins v. Marathon LeTourneau Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1990
  3. Waye v. First Citizen's National BankDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Frito-Lay of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. CañasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
  5. Amrein v. Wyoming Livestock BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Plymale v. DonnellyWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Essex Holding, LLC v. Basic Props., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State Ex Rel. Serrano v. BellamyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Ianelli v. CaminoWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  5. In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of Thomas Lankford: Maureen Utley and Norma Ballweg v. Thomas Lankford and Elaine HanksWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API