Legal Opinion
State ex rel. International Harvester Co. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1974No. 74-947PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
One proposition of law is presented by appellant in this appeal. It reads-.
“A writ of mandamus should be ordered when the Industrial Commission is guilty of gross abuse of discretion in awarding permanent total disability benefits for a condition not allowed in a workmen’s compensation claim.”
In support of the foregoing proposition, appellant states that the “* * * only injury for which this claim has ever been allowed is ‘lumbo-sacral strain,’ ” while the permanent and total disability finding is based upon the opinion of two physicians who “based their evaluations on findings and conditions…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Szekely v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Spangler Candy Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988