Legal Opinion

State ex rel. International Harvester Co. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1974No. 74-947PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

One proposition of law is presented by appellant in this appeal. It reads-.

“A writ of mandamus should be ordered when the Industrial Commission is guilty of gross abuse of discretion in awarding permanent total disability benefits for a condition not allowed in a workmen’s compensation claim.”

In support of the foregoing proposition, appellant states that the “* * * only injury for which this claim has ever been allowed is ‘lumbo-sacral strain,’ ” while the permanent and total disability finding is based upon the opinion of two physicians who “based their evaluations on findings and conditions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Szekely v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Spangler Candy Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API