Legal Opinion

Christopher Meza v. Daniel Quidort

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 10, 2024No. 5:23-cv-01379Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER MEZA, ) Case No. EDCV 23-01379 DDP (SHKx) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING OFFICER DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. ) MOTION TO DISMISS ) 14 DANIEL QUIDORT, ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ___________________________ ) 16 17 Presently before the court is Defendants Daniel Quidort and 18 Trent Tunstall (collectively, the “Officer Defendants”)’s Motion to 19 Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. Having considered the submissions 20 of the parties and heard oral argument, the court denies the motion 21 and adopts the following…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API