Legal Opinion

Livingston v. Blumenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 23, 1936PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

The action is to recover the reasonable value of professional services rendered to defendant by plaintiff’s assignor in various legal matters enumerated in the complaint.

*139The documentary evidence submitted upon the motion, together with the affidavits and pleadings, sufficiently establish that there are no triable issues of fact and that only the amount of damages, that is, the value of the professional services rendered, remains for determination.

Defendant contends that as there is an issue, namely, one of damages, to be tried, it necessarily follows that a jury trial upon all issues becomes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Central & Montgomery Railroad v. Morris & CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. 379 Madison Avenue Inc. v. Stuyvesant Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. 379 Madison Avenue, Inc. v. Stuyvesant CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Hickman v. Baltimore & O. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Sullivan v. DarlingNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cogen v. Robin Klinger Children's EntertainmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Small v. KronstatNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Paramount Communications Inc. v. Horsehead Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API