Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Andrew Poronto v. T.D. Hoist, et al.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 29, 2025No. 2:24-cv-10522Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ANDREW PORONTO, Plaintiff, Case No. 24-cv-10522 v. Honorable Robert J. White T.D. HOIST, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER DENYING NURSES BREEN AND DEBUS’S MOTION TO PARTIALLY DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT I. Introduction Andrew Poronto commenced this

42 U.S.C. § 1983

action against, among others, Wellpath, LLC and two of its nurse employees, Sara Breen and Kenneth Debus. The amended complaint alleges that Breen and Debus exhibited deliberate indifference to Poronto’s underlying seizure condition while he was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Tjymas Blackmore v. Kalamazoo CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Fritz v. Charter Township of Com-StockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Rouster Ex Rel. Estate of Rouster v. County of SaginawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. Alspaugh v. McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API