Legal Opinion

People v. Quesada

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1980No. Crim. 20258PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

Defendant’s house was burglarized during the night while no one was at home. Two days later, under circumstances we shall describe, defendant shot and killed the burglar. In response to charges of murder with use of a firearm, defendant claimed justification under Penal Code section 197, subdivision 4, which provides that “[h]omicide is.. .justifiable. . .When necessarily committed in attempting, by lawful ways and means, to apprehend any person for any felony committed,...” By case law, that justification exists “only where the felony committed is one which threatens death…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CeballosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. ChermanskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. State v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  4. State v. NylandWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. LoustaunauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. People v. ReadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People v. ZindaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API