Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Kleindienst

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1982No. SB 60-2. State Bar No. 79-1-S19Published

1DissentFeldman, Justice

I concur with the finding that respondent violated DR 1 — 102(A)(4) and (5) and that he should be disciplined for these violations. I write to express my opinion that respondent has been treated too leniently. Considering the nature of these transactions and of respondent’s past record, he should be disbarred.

I recognize that the recommendation of the State Bar is entitled to serious consideration and I would ordinarily not deviate from its recommendation. However, as the majority opinion points out, this court is the ultimate trier of both fact and law in disciplinary proceedings (In re…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Bar v. KleindienstDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Matter of StoutArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, WetzelArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, StewardArizona Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API