Legal Opinion
Bickerstaff v. Cuyahoga County
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 21, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01142Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Brenda Bickerstaff, Case No. 1:18cv1142 Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER Cuyahoga County, et al., MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendants ORDER Currently pending is pro se Plaintiff Brenda Bickerstaff’s Objection to the Report & Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Parker dated June 11, 2020. (Doc. Nos. 146, 148.) Also pending is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Cuyahoga County Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Objection, which the County Defendants opposed. (Doc. Nos. 152, 153.) For the following reasons: Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.