Kiess v. Hamann

SUMMARY OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Respondent brought an action to have appellants remove a portion of their fence from respondent’s land. The parties presented conflicting surveys regarding the location of the driveway relative to the boundary of their property. The trial court adopted the survey which was approved by an arbitration committee of the Minnesota Land Surveyors. The survey adopted by the trial court showed that except for 51 feet, appellants’ fence was on respondent’s land.

The trial court issued its findings of fact and order for judgment on May 23, 1984, an amended…