Legal Opinion

People v. Patton

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 25, 2019No. D074344Published

1Opinion of the CourtDato, J.

Defendant Kayvon Patton pleaded guilty to grand theft of personal property ( Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a) )1 and was sentenced to three years of formal probation. Among the conditions of probation was a condition subjecting his electronic devices to warrantless search. Patton challenges this condition as unreasonable under People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481, 124 Cal.Rptr. 905, 541 P.2d 545 ( Lent ) and unconstitutionally overbroad.

At the outset, we reject the People's contention that Patton's appeal should be dismissed because he failed to obtain a certificate of probable cause. (See §…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API