Legal Opinion

Farrell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1993No. 1280-92PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by the trial judge of theft, Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 31.-03(e)(4)(B), and sentenced to confinement for forty-five years. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 12.-42. The Court of Appeals found the evidence insufficient and entered a judgment of acquittal. Farrell v. State, 837 S.W.2d 395, 401 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1992). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in failing to reform the judgment and find appellant guilty of the lesser offense of theft. We will…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rochelle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Riley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Degrate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Alvarado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  5. Farrell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Thierry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  3. S.D.G. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Sotelo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Hallmark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API