Legal Opinion

Farrell v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 31, 1992No. 05-91-00649/650-CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAPLAN, Justice.

The trial court convicted Felisha Farrell of theft from the person and credit card abuse. Punishment in each case, enhanced by two prior convictions, was assessed at forty-five years’ confinement. In five points of error, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support both convictions and that the trial court erred in admitting a charge slip, videotape recording, and photograph into evidence. We affirm appellant’s conviction for credit card abuse. We reverse appellant’s conviction for theft from the person and enter a judgment of aquittal.

FACTUAL…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Earls v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Thierry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  2. Farrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. S.D.G. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. People v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API