Legal Opinion
People v. Ruthven
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided May 29, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.
The information charges that the defendant, a dealer, sold to the public within this State, as principal, certain securities without having caused to be filed in the Department of Law of the State of New York a statement known as a “ dealer’s statement,” in violation of subdivision 2 of section 359-e of the General Business Law, prohibiting dealer, as principal, broker, or agent, or otherwise, from so selling.
Upon the hearings, five witnesses were called on behalf of the prosecution. Four of these witnesses had been stockholders in the corporation in question, the Union Simplex Train Control…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allen v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Palmer v. . Van SantvoordNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- James v. . PattenNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Cawker v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. BellingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Backiel v. Citibank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. Michael Glenn Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. MinuseNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Century Insurance v. Glidden Buick Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1940