Legal Opinion
Marie Sannon v. United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 4, 1980No. 80-5088PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge:
The government asserts in this appeal that a federal district court has exceeded its authority by requiring the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to publicize certain new regulations more extensively than the notice provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 553 (1976), would mandate. Determining that all named petitioners have received the relief they sought in this lawsuit and regarding class-wide relief as constitutionally impermissible under the facts, we remand the case to the district court with instructions to vacate the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Marie Lucie Jean v. Alan C. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,265 Fred Zeidman and Steven Youngelson v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Daniel Clark Medberry v. James CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.