Legal Opinion
Robinson v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 10, 2005No. Civ.A. No. 04-3948PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUFE, District Judge.
This is a section 1983 action in which Plaintiff Stacey Robinson (“Robinson”) alleges that her former employer, Defendant City of Philadelphia (the “City”), took certain illegal actions against her in retaliation for her cooperation with a federal criminal investigation of corruption within City government. Pending before the Court are the City’s Motions to Place this Case in Civil Suspense Until Such Time as the Investigation of the Grand Jury is Concluded or, Alternatively, to Compel Depositions and Requests for Production of Documents. For…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- International Primate Protection League v. Administrators of Tulane Educational FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Grand Jury Matter. Appeal of Nicholas CataniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Linder, David v. Calero-PortocarreroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ott v. City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011
- In re Vioxx Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006