Legal Opinion
Friedland v. Fauver
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 31, 1998No. 96-3465 (MLC)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOPER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Friedland brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S .C. § 1983 for claims arising from his arrest and incarceration for violation of the terms of his parole. Currently before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a), and plaintiffs motion for injunctive relief pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 65. The Court has reviewed the pleadings and the parties’ written submissions and considered the matter pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons described below, the Court will deny plaintiffs motions, and…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Craig v. EberlyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Leamer v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Leamer v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Shabazz v. ColeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Marrie v. NickelsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.