Brussell v. Maimon

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This action in assumpsit resulted in a verdict in the court below for plaintiff. Defendant appealed.

The facts of the transaction, from the plaintiff’s standpoint which on this appeal we must accept as true, the verdict being in his favor, may be briefly stated as follows:

During December, 1929, Jacob Maimón, a member of the defendant firm, came to plaintiff’s place of business in Philadelphia at different times, with various employees, and finally selected certain machines for the partnership, for which he agreed to pay the sum of $1,475. He informed the plaintiff of a…