State v. Boswell
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
I
{¶ 1} This case requires us to apply our jurisprudence regarding postrelease control to the circumstances in which a defendant seeks to withdraw his guilty plea to a crime that required postrelease control as part of the sentence, but the trial court failed to include it. We hold that because the sentence is void as contrary to law, the defendant must be resentenced, and his motion to withdraw his plea must be treated as a presentence motion under Crim.R. 32.1. “[A] presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea should be freely and liberally granted.” State v. Xie (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 521,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. PeterseimOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- State v. SingletonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Harper (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.