Legal Opinion

People v. Spiro

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided March 15, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Demurrer to an indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

Crain, J.:

The defendant Spiro demurs to an indictment drawn for the purpose of charging him and his codefendants with a violation of subdivision 6 of section 580 of the Penal Law. This enacts that “ If two or more persons conspire * * * to commit any act * * * for the * * * obstruction of justice, or of the due administration of the laws. Each of them is guilty of a misdemeanor.” He asserts by his demurrer that it appears *55•upon the face of the indictment that the facts stated therein do not constitute a crime and that the indictment does not substantially conform to the requirements of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. . FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Baldwin v. FranksSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. People v. . WillisNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. State v. RipleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1850
  5. State v. NoyesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PerlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Commonwealth v. DonoghueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. People v. McCueNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1931
  4. United States v. PerlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API