Legal Opinion

Diamond-O Navigation Co. v. Mystic S. S. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1925No. 4448PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

This was a libel in rem against the steamship Taussig by the Diamond-0 Navigation Company for damages resulting from a collision in the Columbia river, about off the town of Kalama, Wash. The libel was filed by the Diamond-0 Navigation Company, not only for its own damages, but as bailee for damages to cargo which was on the barge, and most of which was lost. Upon the trial it was stipulated that proof of any damages should be postponed until the question of liability was decided. The' District Court held there was no liability, and the Diamond-0 Company appealed.

The facts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. The Victory & the PlymothianSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. The AriadneSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. The" Sunnyside"Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. The WesthallDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. China Union Lines, Ltd., Mitsubishi International Corporation, Lan Jing-Chau, Armement Deppe, S.A. v. A. O. Andersen & Co., American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc. v. Card Towing Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Fay v. Compagnia Générale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  4. The BrightDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941
  5. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co. v. Western Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API