Legal Opinion

Pickrell v. Mendel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Percy A. Pickrell, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 19th day of May, 1903, granting leave to the defendant Charles L. Mendel to serve a supplemental answer upon payment of fifteen dollars costs.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

The plaintiff appeals from an order permitting the defendant Charles A. Mendel to serve a supplemental answer to the complaint. The affidavit upon which the motion for leave to serve the pleading was founded was made by the attorney for the defendant, but all the facts stated in that affidavit as grounds for the application were within the personal knowledge of the affiant. The plaintiff sued to recover from Mendel certain moneys belonging to the America’s Historic Families Publishing Company, which it was alleged Mendel had misappropriated; the complaint also alleged that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lifshitz v. MinskerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1910
  2. Rosenbaum v. BreslauerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API