Legal Opinion

Quackenbush v. Slate

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1942No. 28375PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiffs instituted this action to recover damages from defendants caused by the alleged conspiracy of defendants to fraudulently deprive plaintiffs of their interests in a mine.

The pertinent part of the complaint contains the following allegations. Defendants G. J. Vervaeke and Mary Vervaeke, his wife, February 5, 1938, gave to Neil E. Bayne an option to purchase their Deer Trail Mine for one hundred thousand dollars on deferred payment terms, and on the same day Bayne transferred the option to the Metals Development Company, Inc., which entered into immediate possession. Prior to October…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eyak River Packing Co. v. HuglenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Dart v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Kietz v. Gold Point Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Morrow v. MorrowWashington Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Nelson v. PlacanicaWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Harrington v. RichesonWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Baun v. Lumber & Sawmill Workers Union, Local No. 2740Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State v. Basin Development & Sales Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API