Legal Opinion

Pierce v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 8, 2006No. 56, 2006PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice:

Defendant-Appellant Gary D. Pierce (“Pierce”) appeals his convictions in Superior Court of two counts of Attempted First Degree Rape and two counts of First Degree Rape. Pierce first claims that the incident leading to his conviction should be viewed as a single, ongoing incident rather than four separate and distinct assaults because his acts took no longer than 15 minutes to complete. He also claims that the Superior Court erred by refusing to give a specific jury instruction regarding single theory unanimity. We find no merit to his arguments and affirm.

I

Emily Hoffner 1…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  4. Probst v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. Dougherty v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Coles v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  4. Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  5. Sahin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API