Sahin v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
Ramazan Sahin, the defendant-below (“Sahin”), appeals from a Superior Court order denying his Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 motion for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Sahin claims that his trial defense attorney’s comments to the trial judge, made before and during his bench trial, constituted ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of his Sixth Amendment right. Sahin further argues that defense counsel’s comments created an objective appearance of judicial bias against him, thereby violating his right to a fair trial. We find no merit in these claims,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Stevenson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Claudio v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Urquhart v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
- Ramazan Sahin v. Brian Emig, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
- Sahin v. MayDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Sahin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2022
- State of Delaware v. Alley.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.