Legal Opinion

Star Athletica, L. L. C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 22, 2017No. 15–866PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

Congress has provided copyright protection for original works of art, but not for industrial designs. The line between art and industrial design, however, is often difficult to draw. This is particularly true when an industrial design incorporates artistic elements. Congress has afforded limited protection for these artistic elements by providing that "pictorial, graphic, or sculptural features" of the "design of a useful article" are eligible for copyright protection as artistic works if those features "can be identified separately from, and are capable of existing independently of, the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Matal v. TamSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Kevin Lipman v. Armond BudishCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  4. Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. NewtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. Mitchell v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API