Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Lamarque

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 27, 1997No. 95-P-489PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

All the parties in this action own lots in a subdivision in Harwich. The plaintiffs’ lots are situated about one-half mile from a private beach reserved for use by the subdivision owners. They claim that their express easements to use the beach and to pass and repass over a strip providing access to the beach from a road in the subdivision give them an implied easement to park on that road. The defendants’ lots abut the road. On cross motions for summary judgment, the Land Court judge concluded that although the plaintiffs *372have a general right of passage along the road, their right of passage…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Fox v. Union Sugar RefineryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Dale v. BedalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Bacon v. Onset Bay Grove Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Boudreau v. ColemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. JOSEPH O. LAVOIE, JR., & another v. JOHN A. McRAE.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
  2. Boyce ex rel. 210 K Street Condominium Trust v. LasoffMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005
  3. Donohue v. BatemanMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004
  4. Kitras v. Town of AquinnahMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  5. Kitras v. Town of AquinnahMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API