Legal Opinion

Imel v. Van Deren

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Gilpin Countyt The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, C. J.

This was an action upon a replevin bond, and having been instituted before the adoption of the Code of Civil Procedure, is to be determined according to the former practice, and the statute then in force.

The bond was conditioned as required by section 6 of the chapter on replevin, in Revised Statutes, 1868, p. 538. The required conditions are, “to prosecute such suit with effect, and without delay, and make return of the property, if return thereof be awarded, and to pay all damages which may be adjudged against him for the detention thereof, and to save and keep harmless such officer in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Petrie v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Humphrey v. TaggartIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Clark v. HowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cox v. SargentColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. White v. JacksonColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Clark v. National Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Cox v. SargentColorado Court of Appeals · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API