Legal Opinion

Toomey v. Arizona, State of

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 21, 2021No. 4:19-cv-00035Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 10 11 Russell B Toomey, No. CV-19-00035-TUC-RM (LAB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 State of Arizona, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendants State of Arizona, Andy Tobin, and Paul 18 Shannons’ (“State Defendants”) Appeal (Doc. 223) of the Magistrate Judge’s Order 19 (Doc. 213) Granting Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Compel Production of Documents 20 (Doc. 195). Plaintiff responded to the Appeal. (Doc. 232.) For the following reasons, the 21 Appeal will be denied and Magistrate Judge…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawrence S. Bittaker v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison of San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. The Home Indemnity Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Lane Powell Moss and Miller, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Sanmina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Harry T. Hanley, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API