Legal Opinion

Bohny v. Associated Dyeing & Printing Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 20, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The plaintiff below had a judgment for personal injuries and property damage arising out of a collision between his automobile and the defendant’s auto truck. One party defendant was designated in the process as “Associated Dyeing and Printing Corporation” when, as a matter of fact, it should have been designated as “Associated Dyeing and Printing Company, Incorporated.” The driver of the truck that was involved in the accident was named as the other defendant.

We gather from the record that this mistake in the name of the party defendant was not discovered by anyone before or at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holt v. United Security Life Insurance & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  2. In re the Estate of DiamentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  3. Hammersma v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dorman v. Usbe Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RAYMOND WILSON (12-02-0210, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API