Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sale

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1990No. 1369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

The Commonwealth appeals from a pretrial ruling excluding evidence of a business’ reputation as a house of ill repute or prostitution in a prosecution of the owner on charges of promoting prostitution, gambling and criminal conspiracy. In its Notice of Appeal, the Commonwealth has certified that the exclusion order seriously impairs its ability to present its case and prove the crime. We determine that evidence of a business’ reputation as a house of ill repute is not admissible to establish the actual character of the business. Accordingly, we affirm.

In 1988, undercover…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Midvale Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Commonwealth v. DolanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Commonwealth v. MurrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Commonwealth. v. VisotskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MatisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. ApolloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. MatisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API