Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dolan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1944No. Appeals, 151, 152 and 153PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion ex

Hirt, J.,

Marie Dolan was charged with maintaining a disorderly house and using it for the purpose of prostitution. Marge DeLenko and Charlotte Sandman were each charged with committing prostitution in the same building. The three were indicted under §512 of the Criminal Code of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, 18 PS 4512. The cases, oxer the objection of defendants, were tried together and each of the defendants was found guilty as indicted. On their motions new trials were granted, the trial judge dissenting. The Commonwealth’s appeals from these orders will be dismissed.

We need not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SparduteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Commonwealth v. BeckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Commonwealth v. CavalierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EVANSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. MeltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. MeltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Commonwealth v. HartmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Berkery v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API