Legal Opinion
Rivers v. Rivers
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 1981No. 14641PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARVIN, Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether the mere refusal of the holder of a promissory note to accept the tender of three installment payments on the note, two of which were past due and the other not yet due, is sufficient to accelerate maturity of the note under this acceleration clause:
“Failure to pay any two (2) successive installments on this note at maturity shall, at the option of the holder and owner, mature this note in its entirety and render it due and exigible for the unpaid balance, including principal, interest, attorney’s fees and costs.”
The note also contains the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chapman v. Capri Construction CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Meyer v. Consolidated Marketing, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Travelers Indem. Co. v. DucoteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bank of New York v. ParnellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rochester v. MulloneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993