Legal Opinion
Richard L. Verrilli, Cross-Appellee v. City of Concord, Cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1977No. 75-1542, 75-2157PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant seeks a belated recall of the mandate in this case. A response in opposition has been filed and considered. The case is reported at 548 F.2d 262 (1977). The sequence of principal events leading to this posture is as follows:
This case was argued and submitted on September 8, 1976.
Thfe opinion was filed January 3, 1977, and in Part III thereof dealing with a district court award of attorney’s fees (548 F.2d at 266), against the City of Concord we remanded for a determination of “the existence or nonexistence of bad faith”, basing our decision on Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- The Stanford Daily v. James Zurcher, Individually and as Chief of Police of the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Donald E. Powers v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. McKie Lighter Co., Inc., Donald E. Powers v. McKie Lighter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Richard L. Verrilli, Cross-Appellee v. City of Concord, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
3Cited by22 opinions
- Nevius v. SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Burgess v. Premier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Thompson v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Tejpal S. SETHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Gary Bryant v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.