Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Torquemada

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1950No. Civ. 14092PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment determining a deed absolute in form to he a mortgage and ordering defendants to reconvey the property upon the payment of an amount determined by the court to he secured thereby.

No question is made of the correctness of the amount to be paid but appellants argue that the finding that the deed was in fact a mortgage is not supported by the evidence. The evidence was in sharp conflict and appellants invoke the clear and convincing evidence rule. It is now settled that this rule is one for the guidance of the trial court and an appellate court’s inquiry ends…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Lotts v. Board of Park CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Allen v. MeyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Busick v. MandevilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Ellis v. Union Trust CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re San Francisco Industrial Park, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1969
  2. Caviglia v. JarvisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Dinkins v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API