Legal Opinion

Dyba Et Ux. v. Borowitz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1939No. Appeal, 176PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This appeal is from the decree of the court below dismissing defendant’s exceptions to a bill in equity and ordering the defendant to remove a fence erected by him on the dividing line between the properties .of the parties to the suit.

Plaintiffs and defendant own adjoining lots in the city of Pittsburgh. Each abuts 20 feet on the westerly side of Eighteenth Street and extends back therefrom 105 feet. On the front of each lot is erected a brick dwelling, numbered respectively 52 and 50 South Eighteenth Street. On October 26, 1918, the common owner conveyed premises No.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mercantile Library Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Connery v. BrookeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  3. Hartman v. FickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Willing v. BookerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  5. Good v. PetticrewSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Landis, J. & D. v. Wilt, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. EDWARDS Et Ux. v. JulianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Green v. Mutual Steel CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Sweigart v. BurkholderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Tanaka v. SheehanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API