Usher v. Hiatt
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Error from Leavenworth District Court. Action by Hiatt and Maris, counting on a contract set forth in full in the opinion, infra. The district court, at the September Term, 1877, gave judgment in favor of ’plaintiffs for $1,473, and costs, and against Usher, defendant, who brings the case here for review.
1Opinion of the Court
The .opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:.This is the second time that we have been called upon to consider this case. (Usher v. Hiatt, 18 Kas, 195.) At the first time, we reversed the judgment of the court below, and remanded the case for a new trial. A new trial was afterward had before the court below and a jury, which resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs below, Hiatt and Maris, and against the defendant below, Usher, for $1,473 and costs. Usher now as plaintiff in error seeks to have this judgment reversed. The principal grounds urged for reversal…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Usher v. HiattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
3Cited by2 opinions
- Underwood v. VilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Templeton v. BiegertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909