Legal Opinion
Usher v. Hiatt
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 15, 1877PublishedCited by 7 opinions
M'ror from Leavenworth District Court. Action by Hiatt and Maris, counting on a contract set out in full in the opinion, infra. The district court, at the January Term 1875, gave judgment in favor of plaintiffs for $584.55, and Usher, defendant, brings the case here for review.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The parties to this suit made the following contract:
“It is agreed between John P. Usher, O. S. Hiatt and C. F. Maris, as follows: Said Hiatt & Maris agree^to reset, cultivate and complete the hedges upon sections 23 and 24 of township 10, range 22, in Leavenworth county, and section 19, in Wyandotte county, immediately east of said sections, which were undertaken to be grown by A. S. Penfield; to cultivate and maintain said hedges in a skillful manner, until the same shall be sufficient to turn orderly stock, and such as is contemplated…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Cosden Oil & Gas Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- E. D. Metcalf Co. v. GilbertWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
- Thornton ex rel. Thornton v. FranseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Quigley v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Anderson v. Cliff Gold Mining Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.