Legal Opinion

Plunkett v. Weddington

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 12, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

This action was brought to determine the right to use a roadway referred to as Honeysuckle Way No. 1. The appellants, plaintiffs below, unsuccessfully sought to prohibit the appellees from using the roadway, and to that end the right to maintain a barrier or obstruction across the end of the roadway and the removal of a tile placed in a drainage ditch crossing the road.

Appellants are the owners of part of the lots in a subdivision located west of Preston Highway, south of Standiford Field, in Jefferson County. Their lots front on Honeysuckle Way No. 1. Part of the appellees,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Buhl v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Albes v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. State v. CamperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Royal Transit, Inc. v. Village of West MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Long v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
  2. Brazer v. Borough of MountainsideSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Welles v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Delph v. DalyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  5. City of Williamstown v. RubyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API