United States v. Riley
District Court, S.D. New York
At Law. On motions to revive actions.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The above four, actions were commenced in 1893 and 1894 on account of the fraudulent undervaluation of various consignments of imported goods, amounting altogether to upwards of $80,000. The goods having been delivered to the defendant, the above suits wen: brought under the ninth section of tire act of congress of .June 10, 1890, for the forfeiture of tin: value of the goods. The defendant died in April, 1899, and his son Lester U. Riley having been appointed administrator, the plaintiff now moves that said actions be revived against the administrator.
The present case…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- The United States v. James and John G. Daniel, Executors of Beverly Daniel, Late U. S. MarshalSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- United States v. De GoerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889
- Jones v. VanzandtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1849
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walsh v. New York, N. H. & H. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1909
- United States v. WittemannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907